From hkhenson@cogeco.ca Fri Jul 05 07:31:40 2002 Path: sn-us!sn-xit-06!supernews.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!news.lightlink.com!news2.lightlink.com From: hkhenson@cogeco.ca (Keith Henson) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: More cult abuse of/through the courts Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 11:31:40 GMT Organization: Temple of At'L'An Lines: 39 Message-ID: <3d258320.35030668@news2.lightlink.com> References: <3d1d27b3.4136660@news2.lightlink.com> <3d22848b.53643158@news2.lightlink.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 172.16.34.12 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451 X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.141.40.229 X-Original-Trace: 5 Jul 2002 07:25:35 -0400, 24.141.40.229 Xref: sn-us alt.religion.scientology:1086038 On Wed, 3 Jul 2002 01:48:37 +0100, Dave Bird wrote: > > I have read the whole of this analysis and can't better it; I hope > you follow her advice, Keith. Might not have to file. :-) Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 07:27:54 -0400 To: trh@hoganlaw.com From: Keith Henson Subject: Latest motion, RTC vs Henson case Tom, per the phone message I left yesterday, I am extremely busy lately so you have a chance to get off the hook. You should think hard about wasting the court's time with a contempt motion claiming NOTs 56. (Or that 3 lines is abusing their copyright in NOTs 34.) If you look at the last paragraph of *your own* Exhibit 13 the origin of NOTs 56 is explained. I.e., for RTC to claim copyright on this piece of dreck is shown to be a fraud on the court *in your own exhibit.* If I don't get a call from you early today telling me the motion is being withdrawn, I will file a reply alerting the court to this fraud. Keith Henson 2237 Munns Ave. Oakville, ON L6H 3M9 Canada 905-844-6216 (fax available by prearrangement) 416-529-2789 (cell)