Dear Mr. Cook:

I just posted the letter you sent by Fed Ex to the news group
alt.religion.scientology.

This was done as a policy, not to damage the reputation of lawyers who
work for the "classically terroristic" cult (Time Magazine May 6,
1991, description upheld on appeal).  There is a more important
function which you can see in recent postings of draft motions.  

I am not a lawyer, and I need all the help I can get from concerned
net citizens worldwide who read this saga on the Internet and have
been doing so for the last ten years.  For them to be able to help
they need to be fully aware of such communications as I receive.

I am sorry if you feel this is unfair, but you should have done some
research into the nature and history of this case.

Re your complaint about 3rd parties, I can only quote:

JUDGE WEISSBRODT:  You're welcome to send out interrogatories, Mr.
Henson.  . . . . you're not restricted in whom you can send an
interrogatory to.  

As to the existence of other remedies, your client was the one who
"destroyed" starting when another of their attorneys, a lawyer with a
reputation for working for the Mafia, personally delivered a death
threat to me in front of the courtroom doors.

Given previous and subsequent threats and attempts to kill me made by
agents of scientology, I had to consider his threat credible,
especially in the closed environment of a county jail in a county
known for corruption and especially given inside information provided
me by another county official.

I believe the law recognizes necessity, even if it require flight from
a corrupt county.

Incidentally, I don't consider Dezotell, Wagoner and Hoden to be your
clients.  From such matters as your not knowing how to pronounce
Hoden's name I suggest that you have never seen them and that in fact
they are not paying your bills.

In regard to the substance of your comments on intrinsic vs extrinsic
fraud, 

EXTRINSIC FRAUD

Definition:

   1. [noun] fraud that prevents a party from knowing their rights or
from having a fair opportunity of presenting them at trial
      Synonyms: collateral fraud

I certainly was not provided with a fair opportunity to present a
case, being forbidden to even mention I was engaged in First Amendment
activity when it is specifically excepted in 422.6(c).


Very Truly Yours,

Keith Henson

cc Judge Weissbrodt