From hkhenson@home.com Mon Oct 29 12:57:49 2001
Path: sn-us!sn-xit-04!supernews.com!news-xfer.siscom.net!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!newspeer.monmouth.com!news.lightlink.com!news2.lightlink.com
From: hkhenson@home.com (Keith Henson)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Henson Appeal brief due Nov. 13
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 17:57:49 GMT
Organization: Temple of At'L'An
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <3bdd970d.129881397@news2.lightlink.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.34.12
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.141.40.229
X-Original-Trace: 29 Oct 2001 12:57:52 -0500, 24.141.40.229
Xref: sn-us alt.religion.scientology:997082


[Later today I will post the motion and declaration which are missing
from the appeal record.  HKH]]

H. Keith Henson
2237 Munns Ave.
Oakville, ON  L6H 3M9  Canada
905-844-6216
hkhenson@home.com

October 27, 2001

Frita Sonksen
Hall of Justice
Appeals Division
4100 Main Street.
Riverside, CA 92501
909-955-1565


Dear Ms Sonksen:

             Yesterday Cindy Cohn of the Electronic Frontier
Foundation told me that the opening brief for my appeal is due to be
filed on Nov. 13, 2001.  I can produce something pro se by that time,
but was wondering why I found out about the briefing schedule by this
accidental pathway?  It is, as you know, the *second* time a Riverside
court has failed to notify me of a critical court date, the first
being failure to notify me about the arraignment in this very case.

	I presume (given this date) that I am not being assigned
counsel nor are my objections to the altered transcripts being
considered.

	I have to admit that considering what I have seen to date this
is not the least bit surprising.


Sincerely, 



H. Keith Henson

Posted to a.r.s to create a public record