From hkhenson@home.com Tue Sep 25 03:08:42 2001 Path: sn-us!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!feeder.qis.net!newspeer.monmouth.com!news.lightlink.com!news2.lightlink.com From: hkhenson@home.com (Keith Henson) Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: Latest suit against Henson by CoS Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 07:08:42 GMT Organization: Temple of At'L'An Lines: 238 Message-ID: <3bb12c37.828714@news2.lightlink.com> References: <3b7dc692.29125063@news2.lightlink.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.34.12 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451 X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.141.40.229 X-Original-Trace: 25 Sep 2001 03:08:15 -0400, 24.141.40.229 Xref: sn-us alt.religion.scientology:982275 On 20 Aug 2001 12:22:05 -0700, gizmo99@valise.com (Frieda Wellington) wrote: snip >> NOTICE TO DEFENDANT: (Aviso a Acusado) >> H. KEITH HENSON, >> >> YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF: >> (A Ud. la asti damandancio) >> HILARY DEZOTELL, KEN HODEN, and BRUCE WAGONER >> >> FOR COURT USE ONLY >> (SOLO mm I/so oe LA COHTE) [blank box] >> >> You hava 30 CALENDAR DAYS after this >> summons Is served on you to file a typewritten >> response at this court. For those interested in these suits, I filed two replies to them. The first came back with "Canceled" written on it, but that might have been fixed. Hard to say and it may not make a bit of difference. H. Keith Henson 2237 Munns Ave Oakville, Ontario L6H 3M9 Canada Telephone: (905) 844-6216 Pro Se SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE HILLARY DEZOTEL, KEN, HODEN, and BRUCE WAGONER, Plaintiffs, vs.H. KEITH HENSON Defendant. ))))))))))))))))))) CASE NO.: 009673DEPT. H5 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE OF:DIVERSE PARTIES, VENUE, CHANGE OF VENUE, BANKRUPTCY, REAL PARTIES OF INTEREST, COMPLEXITY, AND OBJECTION TO COMMISSIONER Time: NADATE: NA ) DIVERSE PARTIES, VENUE The court and counsel for the plaintiffs should take notice that the defendant does not live in California, not even in the US but resides at the above address. Defendant has been declared eligible by Immigration Canada to present a case to the Immigration and Refugee Board based on human rights violations by the government and courts of Riverside County, acting for the so called "Church" of Scientology. CHANGE OF VENUE In the event that California Courts are appropriate to try this case, defendant will request a change of venue due to apparent bias of the courts in Hemet. BANKRUPTCY The Court and Counsel should take notice that the defendant was bankrupted by the real party of interest, Religious Technology Center, one of many fronts used by organized Scientology. This bankruptcy, 98-51326ASW-13, Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California, is still unconfirmed due to RTC's opposition after three and a half years. The following is a reply by defendant's bankruptcy lawyer, Stan Zlotoff, to a motion by RTC in the bankruptcy court to disqualify the judge in that case: (The entire reply may be found on the Web, Google Groups May 3, 2001 with the subject title Unsung heros.) "Judge March of the Central District was given a taste of this case when RTC traipsed down there to depose Debtor's daughter, Amber, regarding her college expenses and the ownership of the three paintings mentioned above. Attached hereto are pertinent parts of the transcript of a motion for protective order requested by Amber, in which Judge March remarks: "'I don't think I've even seen a Chapter 23 docket that ran 34 pages in this district. I was amazed when we requested the docket from the Northern District of California and they faxed down 34 pages of their docket from the clerk's office, and I don't think I've ever seen a Chapter 13 case where so many people have had either 2004 exams or depositions taken. It's---it's absolutely amazing.' (p.20) "'I think in light of the history of this case that is reflected in the docket of the N.D. of Cal, which I take judicial notice of, and is reflected in the motion, that there have been a lot of long contentious and duplicative discovery in depositions taken, and that therefore, it was appropriate to move this court for a protective order.'(p.24) "In fact Judge March limited Amber's deposition to one hour and awarded sanctions to Amber of $1,000. Needless to say RTC appealed the decision." Samuel Rosen of Paul, Hastings, deposed defendant's daughter for one hour. Mr. Rosen brags about charging $490 per hour (and no discounts). Paul, Hastings is one of four law firms engaged against the defendant in a bankruptcy action that (it was claimed in court by Mr. Rosen) had cost $800,000 almost a year ago. The maximum possible recovery is a small fraction of this amount, but Scientology's policy requires the spending of vast sums of money and the wasting of court resources as punishment for their "enemies." REAL PARTIES OF INTEREST The named parties are not the real parties of interest. The real party of interest is organized Scientology of which RTC, Church of Scientology International, (CSI) Flag Service Organization, (FSO) and a long list of other alphabet soup shells. They are entirely artificial fictions since all of Scientology is under the control of David Miscavige through Scientology's paramilitary "Sea Org." The real party of interest often sues people through individuals. Defendant has been sued this way before by Glenn Barton in Los Angles, Jones in Clearwater, FL and by Ken Hoden in Riverside before in 1998. This suit is about the 11th action to be brought against the defendant directly or indirectly by Scientology. If it were not clearly obvious who the real party of interest is, one of the six or so services of this lawsuit on the defendant had been mailed from Los Angeles, a strange thing for a lawyer in Hemet to do. Even stranger, two letters from Mr. Rosen on unrelated scientology litigation matters were inadvertently (?) attached to the copy of the complaint. These letters were scanned and may be found on Google Groups as above, posted on Aug. 22, 2001 by the defendant on the thread "Latest suit against Henson by Cos." In part that post reads: "Speaking of fig leafs, I mentioned the mailed copy came out of Los Angeles rather than Hemet. That is not all. Rosen/Paul Hastings has given me powerful evidence they were directing the latest persecution against me by attaching two of Samuel Rosen's letters dated Aug. 9 to the complaint! "One is to CIS about a case not yet filed (may be against the LMT) and one is to Dan Leipold about a deposition in the notorious Lopez case. (Scanned letters attached) "I am turning over the stapled originals to my immigration lawyer who is just fascinated by the continuing organized persecution of a person (me) who is under the protection of the Canadian government. He has never seen anything like it. "The entire Paul Hastings firm may be in trouble here in Canada, not just for what they did, but also for trying to hide it by using a Hemet lawyer as a patsy." COMPLEXITY This case may start with a SLAPP motion. It will bring out perjury by one of the defendants on the witness stand in the criminal case. It will include declarations by people who were part of OSA, Scientology's dirty tricks operative, and filings such as the following is from the case of The Church of Scientology of Texas v. The Internal Revenue Service, No. A 91 CA 152, United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division, March 9, 1993: "The [United States Internal Revenue] Service is aware that Scientology related entities and/or persons affiliated or believed to be affiliated with Scientology have a practice of aggressively harassing its perceived enemies. This awareness was gained from the writings attributed to Sci- entology's founder, Scientology scriptures, the court opinions detailing such action, and the incidents of harassment reported in the Los Angeles Times series published between June 24, and June 29, 1990, in the Time magazine article date May 6, 1991, in other published material, and in the British Broadcasting Company (BBC) program televised April 1989." And from the words of the "Church" founder: "The purpose of a lawsuit is to harass and discourage rather than To win.... Don't ever defend. Always attack. Find or manufacture Enough threat against them to cause them to sue for peace. Originate a black PR campaign to destroy the person's repute and to discredit them so thoroughly they will be ostracized. Be alert to sue for slander at the slightest chance so as to discourage the public presses from mentioning Scientology. It is my specific intention that by the use of professional PR (black PR) tactics any opposition not only be dulled but permanently iradicated." -- L. Ron Hubbard HCOPL 30 may 1974 "The law can be used very easily to harass, and enough harassment On somebody who is simply on the thin edge anyway, will knowing that he is not authorized, will generally be sufficient to cause his professional decease. If possible, of course, ruin him utterly." -- L. Ron Hubbard "A Manual on the Dissemination of Material" (1955) It will be a complex case. OBJECTION TO COMMISSIONER The defendant objects to the use of a Court Commissioner as obviously inappropriate in this case. Respectfully submitted, H. Keith Henson, pro se Dated August 31, 2001