From mike@leptonicsystems.com Tue Sep 11 00:00:00 2001 Path: sn-us!sn-xit-04!supernews.com!feed.textport.net!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!usenetserver.com!news01.optonline.net!news02.optonline.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mike O'Connor Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: Henson Hemet Trial Transcript (to pg 50] References: <3b9c6aff.48375708@news2.lightlink.com> <3b9cc330.70956044@news2.lightlink.com> <3b9cdafc.77048993@news2.lightlink.com> <3b9f32f9.99576604@news2.lightlink.com> <3b9e4f84.106885339@news2.lightlink.com> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.1 (PPC) X-Face: %I5[u;NN-d'{}I|+j$Riju_Eu}N!t).F:-~.me!)K-xe%_CG6[L\)wALnAYG~rN9'j8eK2s}[%*qA5J>L*vPc^b6pO[2j#)?78<2(m\Yx_\_ug:@i,.;U_'ags%TfqMIWH~/YLmJJ^p Message-ID: Lines: 896 Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 04:00:00 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.186.194.203 X-Trace: news02.optonline.net 1000180800 24.186.194.203 (Tue, 11 Sep 2001 00:00:00 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 00:00:00 EDT Organization: Optimum Online Xref: sn-us alt.religion.scientology:975276 Since this portion of the transcript references several ARS postings, I thought it would be useful to see the actual posts being quoted. Remember, these posts were redacted. Portions were blacked out. The court did not allow Mr. Henson to mention Scientology, what was on the picket signs, or the deaths that were a reason for the pickets. It would be interesting to know what portions were censored, but I don't have that info. I couldn't find some of the postings. Can anyone supply the missing ones? In article <3b9e4f84.106885339@news2.lightlink.com>, hkhenson@home.com (Keith Henson) wrote: > On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 21:41:17 GMT, hkhenson@home.com (Keith Henson) > wrote: > > (to page 188) > > 1 HEMET, CALIFORNIA - FRIDAY, APRIL 20, 2001 > 2 MORNING SESSION > 3 (The following proceedings were held in open court > 4 in the presence of the jury.) [...] > 4 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): Mr. Hoden, I'm handing you what's > 5 been previously marked as People's Exhibit Number 24A, which > 6 is a -- which has been previously authenticated as a true and > 7 correct copy of Mr. Henson's posting on the - > 8 MR. HARR: Objection, your Honor, the attorney is > 9 testifying. > 10 MR. SCHWARZ: I'm stating it for the record, your > 11 Honor. > 12 THE COURT: Overruled. > 13 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): -- which has been previously > 14 authenticated by the Court - > 15 THE COURT: Wait a minute, Counsel. > 16 All right. Go ahead. > 17 MR. SCHWARZ: Thank you, your Honor. > 18 Q. Can you please -- do you recognize it? > 19 A. Yes, I do. > 20 Q. And how do you recognize it? > 21 A. Well, this is a document that I saw, you know, > 22 previous to Mr. Henson coming out here. > 23 Q. Okay. And where did you get that document from, or > 24 a copy of? > 25 A. This was sent to me from our church in Los Angeles. > 26 Q. And can you please -- now, did that document give > 27 you concern? > 28 A. Yes, it did. > 1 Q. And can you read the part that gave you concern? > 2 A. Okay. Keith Henson writes here, he says, "The > 3 annihilation of the Church of Scientology and all its fronts > 4 is a worthy goal." I thought -- that was alarming to me, > 5 somebody would want to annihilate my church. > 6 THE COURT: Excuse me, sir, just tell us which part > 7 alarmed you. > 8 THE WITNESS: That part alarmed me. > 9 THE COURT: All right. > 10 MR. SCHWARZ: Okay. Thank you. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ [I could not find the alleged posting referenced above.] ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 11 Do you have Number 15, Madam Clerk? 15A? May I > 12 approach, your Honor? > 13 THE COURT: Yes. > 14 MR. SCHWARZ: Should I continue to ask permission? > 15 Thank you. > 16 Q. I'm handing you what's been previously marked as > 17 People's 15A for identification, which has also been > 18 previously authenticated by the Court as a true and correct > 19 copy of what was posted to the internet by Mr. Henson. > 20 THE COURT: No, sir, that is incorrect. That has > 21 not been authenticated as a true and correct copy. Counsel > 22 misstates. > 23 MR. SCHWARZ: May the People approach? > 24 THE COURT: That is a portion - > 25 MR. SCHWARZ: A portion. A relevant portion. The > 26 relevant portion - > 27 THE COURT: No, sir. That is a portion. > 28 MR. SCHWARZ: A portion. > 1 THE COURT: Please reframe your question. > 2 MR. SCHWARZ: Thank you. > 3 Q. Can you please -- do you recognize it? > 4 A. Yes, I do. > 5 Q. What is it? > 6 A. This is a document that was written by Keith Henson > 7 on the 16th of June, 2000. > 8 Q. When did you first see it? > 9 A. I saw this a few days after it was written. > 10 Q. How did you come to see it? > 11 A. It was sent to me by our church in Los Angeles. > 12 Q. Would you please read to the jury the -- that > 13 portion of that document that caused you to be concerned? > 14 A. Yes. "If you do want to help picket, it is an > 15 impressive sight to see them getting under cover like roaches > 16 when the kitchen light is turned on." [Here is the full posting:] ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From: Keith Henson Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: Noon time mini picket from the LMT Date: 16 Jun 2000 23:48:11 GMT Organization: MindSpring Enterprises Lines: 26 Message-ID: <8ieebr$oii$3@slb3.atl.mindspring.net> References: <394a6a8a.0@news2.lightlink.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: c7.b7.09.75 User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-19990517 ("Psychonaut") (UNIX) (SunOS/4.1.4 (sun4m)) In the interest of keeping suppressive pickets on a roll, I could use some help. I have an unlimited drawing account on the First National Bank of Marcab, but it is *such* a pain to convert to earth currency. Also, the bankruptcy court may ask me to account for how I can afford to picket far from home. So if you would like to support a lengthy picket at Hemet, but don't want to go there yourself, put a few sheckels or marks or pounds in the mail to me, P.O.Box 60012 Palo Alto, CA 94306 I have ways of cashing checks which I don't think have ever resulted in who was contributing getting back to scientology. If you are really paranoid, use money orders. I can dedicate picket days to real or code names. If you do want to help picket, it is an *impressive sight to see them getting under cover like roaches when the kitchen light is turned on. Send email and I will coordinate two or three at a time. Hemet is about 1.5 hours east of LA. Keith Henson PS, and to the person who sent lira, thank you very much, I got it ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 17 MR. SCHWARZ: Thank you. May I approach? > 18 THE COURT: Yes. > 19 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): Let the record reflect that I am > 20 handing the witness what's been previously marked as People's > 21 Exhibit 8A for identification. It is a true and correct copy > 22 of a portion that has been previously authenticated as true > 23 and correct copy of Mr. Henson's posting on the internet. > 24 Do you recognize it, Mr. Hoden? > 25 A. Yes, I do. > 26 Q. How do you recognize it? > 27 A. Well, because I remember having read it. > 28 Q. Okay. What is it? > 1 A. This is a document that was written by Keith Henson > 2 on the 23rd of June, 2000. > 3 Q. And when did you first see it? > 4 A. Would have been within -- probably the 24th. > 5 Usually I would receive these the day after he would post them > 6 on the internet. > 7 Q. How did you come to see it? > 8 A. Well, it was sent to me from the church in Los > 9 Angeles that monitored this internet site. > 10 Q. Would you please read to the jury that portion of > 11 the document that caused you to be concerned? > 12 A. I will. "They are now using the west underpass > 13 slightly, possibly when I am on the east underpass. The > 14 disruption in traffic from one side of the highway to the > 15 other must be killing their stats." > 16 Q. Is that it? > 17 A. Yes, sir. > 18 Q. Thank you. [Here is the full posting:] ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From: Keith Henson Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: Picket report -- Hemet day 1 and 2-2 Date: 23 Jun 2000 23:19:59 GMT Organization: MindSpring Enterprises Lines: 64 Message-ID: <8j0rav$fsd$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net> References: <8irg07$m22$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net> <8iruke$vhk$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: c7.b7.09.67 User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-19990517 ("Psychonaut") (UNIX) (SunOS/4.1.4 (sun4m)) Day four, first part to 2 pm. Due to other entheta activities, I was not out there till about 8:20 or so. A big change today from yesterday. Something like one in six of them are now looking frankly at my sign. The side I show to them is either the "Doubting is not a crime" and the LMT phone, or Arnie's NO OT's, or "Are you implanted with dead space aliens?" They still don't wave, but that would be too much considering all the video cameras. Not long after I set up over the east underpass, a group, mostly women, perhaps Estates project force, were herded past the east under pass and into one of the unfinished building. Man, when that place get's abandoned, those building are going to be worthless if they don't have kitchens (which they most likely don't). (I can't help but wonder if gold base will be turned into an exhibit like the historical Shaker places.) I can't make up my mind if the abandoned look of the buildings under construction is just normal scientology practice or if it has something to do with me being there. I have a bunch of photos which show the unfinished roof. Today there were two guy working on the roof, but that is the first I have seen. (*) seems to have in mind an attack from the road and is raising a massive berm of dirt between his castle and the road. In typical scientology construction mode, they have *one* truck moving dirt, about three trips an hour. Of course, this results in massive under use of the machines to dig the dirt and spread it out. They are now using the west underpass slightly, possibly when I am on the east underpass. The disruption in traffic from one side of the highway to the other must be killing their stats. They must have Friday dress down because there seem to be far fewer guys with ties today. They complained to the Highway Patrol again today. So when the officer came out (disgusted at them) he got a handful of Xenu flyers, and I got his name and his partner's name, officers Luebs and Dopp. They are quite aware of the Lisa McPherson travesty. Good guys, very professional, gave me good advice about picketing that location which I will pass on to anyone who want to take a day or two out there. Speaking of video cameras . . . I have pictures of all I have spotted. Soon as I get the film developed/scanned, will post them. There may be a bunch of them which cannot be seen from the road, but the count of them from the road, five, is way under the number Jeff and Co. spotted in CW. Incidentally, I talked to a random groups of guys. Offered to give them a Xenu flyer and it turned out one of the was on the net and had printed off a copy long time ago, so they were all up on it. Few cars stopped and got a flyer. Part of the reason I am picketing over the east underpass is that there is room for cars to pull out of traffic there. Sorry this is kind of disorganized. If I did more/better reporting, I would be doing less picketing. There is much other stuff going on here which it would not be entirely prudent to report yet. Keith Henson ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ [...] > 5 MR. SCHWARZ: Let the record reflect that I am > 6 handing the defendant -- or the witness, rather, what's been > 7 previously been marked as People's Exhibit Number 20A, which > 8 is a true and correct copy of a portion of a document that > 9 Mr. Henson has authored. > 10 THE COURT: The document was previously > 11 authenticated. > 12 MR. SCHWARZ: That's correct, your Honor. > 13 Q. Do you recognize it, sir? > 14 A. Yes, I do. > 15 Q. What is it? > 16 A. This is a document that was written on the 3rd of > 17 July, 2000, and it's signed, "Keith Henson from the Hemet > 18 front." > 19 Q. And would you please read that portion of the > 20 document that caused you to be concerned? > 21 A. Yes. "I stopped on my way out to collect more > 22 addresses near one of the two clam bed apartments." He refers' > 23 to Scientologists as clams. > 24 MR. HARR: Objection, your Honor, he's not reading > 25 now. > 26 THE COURT: Sustained. > 27 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): Just read the document. > 28 A. "I stopped on my way out to collect more addresses > 1 near one of the two clam bed apartments. There will be > 2 another post on what to do with the addresses. Either they > 3 leave those buses there one heck of a long time, or they are > 4 under orders not to load as long as I am there. Am I that > 5 dangerous even without a picket sign?" That's what he says. [Here is the full posting:] ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From: Keith Henson Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Gold base not dull Date: 3 Jul 2000 03:28:58 GMT Organization: MindSpring Enterprises Lines: 109 Distribution: world Message-ID: <8jp19q$v88$1@slb2.atl.mindspring.net> References: <8jh9fo$lnf$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net> <8jk0uc$gqa$1@slb7.atl.mindspring.net> <8jm6uj$63d$1@slb7.atl.mindspring.net> <8jmj7t$pg2$1@slb1.atl.mindspring.net> <395EFE48.8A0849E3@nospam.spam> <8jo2mc$91p$1@slb1.atl.mindspring.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: c7.b7.09.67 User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-19990517 ("Psychonaut") (UNIX) (SunOS/4.1.4 (sun4m)) I had settled down to thinking this was going to be an endless series of boring pickets enlivened with only little tidbits, like a clam taking a xenu flyer (advertized as OT3) through the fence or seeing a sprinkler on a hose run for over 24 hours on one soggy spot, the silly emergency tree plantings, or the cars backing away from the gates. Well, it was not to be. This morning was dull enough, I stopped on my way out to collect more addresses near one of the two clam bed apartments (there will be another post on what to do with the addresses). Either they leave those buses there one heck of a long time, or they are under orders not to load as long as I am there. Am I that dangerous even without a picket sign? Anyway, I did another picket for an hour or so this morning ending at ten or ten thirty. Other entheta kept me away from more picketing till late in the afternoon, about 4:30. I had walked less than 100 yds from my car which was parked beyond the east overpass when I looked back to wave at traffic and saw two guys walking toward me. This time it was not friendly locals, but scinos, Eliot Richardson, the guy who choked me in LA two years ago, and another heavy set dude who really didn't want his photo taken (and compared to . . ?). I profited from Bob's experience. They threatened me, got in my face and started bull baiting me (child molester etc. per parishoners.org) What they were after was to bash themselves on my sign or get me to bash them and fall down like Howd. I wasn't having any of it, so I jumped into the roadway. They spent the next ten minutes trying to bull bait as they chased me back and forth in the roadway while I flagged down about 20 cars and asked them to call the cops. It if was not so rushed, it would have been funny like the three stooges. Every time I would talk to someone in a car, they would quit bothering me so they could tell the driver I was a mad bomber or child molester or both. As if this kind of DA would keep them from calling the cops! They were (I presume) under orders not to kill me, and so, just pushing me under the wheels of a passing car was not an open option for them. Three deaths in 6 weeks all linked to gold base would likely be the end of them. (But I am not so interested in in speeding thing up to go *that* far.) After a *long* ten minutes, of which I might have some confused photos (and they certainly have a complete video tape) they wound up on the South side of the road, and I was on the North side close to the suppressive parrot's abode. I think they decided that being in the middle of the road when the Highway Patrol showed up would not gain them any points. Officer Labaron was the first to respond. (I would really like to know how many 911 calls they got from the passengers of the cars going by.) I let them get first chance to talk to the officer when he pulled in at the gate. They gave the officer a shore story about trying to "interview" me (spitting in my face from 6 inches!). He informed them that it was not safe to distract someone who was walking along the side of a busy highway and that they should figure out a better place to do interviews. Then he talked to me. All the officers know I have been picketing out there for a considerable time. They are concerned with the danger of picketing that location, but they are also fully aware that if people want to protest, they have a constitutional right to do so. (And, if you are alert, and not being set upon by bull baiting clams, it is not very dangerous.) He got a tight summary of the net vs scn battle, and took away a xenu flyer and one of the flyers I made up for my neighbors-- which has a bunch of URLs on it. He also found out why I have reason to fear these people, and was amazed that I have video tape on the net of the previous time Richardson jumped me. (Photo of neck bruises too.) Gave me more than adequate justification for getting away from them into traffic. About this time Ken Hoden showed up with a woman who was half a step from hysterics. I said hi. For someone with the list of problems he has, he was looking good. The Sheriff officer (a woman named Judge) showed up later and got the same flyers. We talked about Stacey Myer, chain lockers, shore stories, and what to put in a search engine. The Highway Patrol also sent out Sarg. Crawford. He gave me helpful advice about picking places with a longer view of the road to cross--which I will certainly take. The officers have the hardest time understanding what motivates a person of education and accomplishments to put so much effort into breaking the cult when I have no personal connection, like a family member who has been victimized. (The scientologists think I am being paid by the marcabs, and who knows? They might be right. I can't tell who sends me donations.) "Someone has to protest" is the best I can do to explain my motivation. (Last time I was the "someone" I learned how to put cryonics patients on cardiac bypass.) I put in another circuit around the west end (noting that there was a lot more scns than I had yet seen walking in sight of me) moved my car to the west end, put in one more circuit on the west end, moved the car to the east overpass under (*)'s nose and thumbed mine at him and his 40,000 sq ft. house while doing a little more picketing. It was about 5:30 when I packed it in so I could do this report. (*) should read the first (or maybe second) chapter of Revolution From Rosanante and consider how many unstable former scientologists there are. If I were in his shoes (not that they would fit), I sure wouldn't live there. Gold base brought themselves to the attention of the police again when they are already under investigation. Put gold base, Richardson, Hoden and (*) down for a big win. You boys are in a condition of power already this week. There is FAR more going on than what gets into these accounts. It is less exciting than today though. Back in the morning. Keith Henson, from the Hemet front. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 6 Q. Now, while you were reading you indicated what "clam > 7 bed --" how do you take that? What does "clam bed" mean? > 8 MR. HARR: Objection, your Honor, no foundation. > 9 THE COURT: Sustained. > 10 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): Do you know what "clam bed" > 11 means? > 12 MR. HARR: Objection, your Honor, no foundation. > 13 THE COURT: Sustained. > 14 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): Have you ever heard of the term > 15 "clam bed"? > 16 MR. HARR: Objection, your Honor, relevance. > 17 THE COURT: Overruled. > 18 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): Have you ever heard of the term? > 19 A. Yes, sir. > 20 Q. And how is it used? > 21 A. It's a derogatory - > 22 MR. HARR: Objection, your Honor, relevance. > 23 MR. SCHWARZ: It's explaining the document. > 24 THE COURT: Overruled. > 25 MR. HARR: No foundation. > 26 THE COURT: Overruled. > 27 MR. SCHWARZ: Thank you, your Honor. > 28 THE COURT: I take it you are laying the foundation? > 1 MR. SCHWARZ: I'm laying it right now, your Honor. > 2 Q. So have you ever heard of the term "clam"? > 3 A. Yes, I have. > 4 Q. And what is the term referred to? > 5 A. It's a derogatory term referring to Scientologists. > 6 MR. HARR: Objection, your Honor, no foundation. > 7 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): How do you know that - > 8 MR. HARR: Request that that be stricken. > 9 THE COURT: Overruled. > 10 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): How do you know that? > 11 A. I've heard people jeer it out and say it out to > 12 Scientologists before. It's a derogatory term. > 13 Q. Okay. So from that reading of that posting when it > 14 refers to "clam bed," how did you take it? > 15 A. Well, one -- several things. One, he's gloating > 16 about the fact that - > 17 MR. HARR: Objection, your Honor, relevancy about > 18 "gloating." > 19 THE COURT: Sustained. > 20 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): I'm asking you, Mr. Hoden, please > 21 listen to the question, how did you take the term "clam bed"? > 22 What did that mean to you? > 23 A. It was an insulting term. I felt insulted. I'm > 24 sorry. > 25 Q. The term "clam bed" itself as opposed to "clam"? > 26 MR. HARR: Asked and answered. > 27 THE COURT: He's answered the question. > 28 MR. SCHWARZ: Okay. Thank you. > 1 May I approach, your Honor? > 2 THE COURT: Yes. > 3 MR. SCHWARZ: Let the record reflect that I have > 4 handed the witness a copy of -- or what's been previously > 5 marked as People's Exhibit Number 9A for identification, which > 6 is a -- which has been previously been authenticated as a > 7 portion of a document that is -- that Mr. Henson had authored > 8 on a posting. > 9 THE COURT: I'm sorry? That Mr. Henson what? > 10 MR. SCHWARZ: Mr. Henson wrote. > 11 THE COURT: It's been authenticated. The document > 12 - > 13 MR. SCHWARZ: Is authenticated. > 14 THE COURT: This is a - > 15 MR. SCHWARZ: A copy. > 16 THE COURT: -- a portion of a document - > 17 MR. SCHWARZ: I said "portion," your Honor. > 18 THE COURT: -- that has been previously > 19 authenticated by the Court. > 20 MR. SCHWARZ: By the Court. > 21 THE COURT: Right. > 22 MR. SCHWARZ: Yes, your Honor. > 23 THE COURT: Okay. Go ahead. > 24 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): Do you recognize that document? > 25 A. Yes, I do. > 26 Q. What is it? > 27 A. This is a document that was written by Keith Henson > 1 MR. HARR: Objection, your Honor, the witness has no > 2 independent knowledge of that. It's already been discussed. > 3 THE COURT: Sustained. I'm sorry. Overruled. > 4 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): What is it? > 5 A. This is a document that was written by Keith Henson > 6 on the 4th of July, 2000. > 7 Q. When did you first see it? > 8 A. I saw this on about the 5th of July, next day. > 9 Q. How did you come to see it? > 10 A. It was sent to me by our church in Los Angeles. > 11 Q. Would you please read to the jury that portion of > 12 the document that caused you to be concerned? > 13 A. "This morning I got out there before 7:00 a.m. I > 14 was not early enough to follow the buses back to the two clam > 15 apartments. But all four went by my picket signs within a > 16 ten-minute period close to 7:00 a.m. The buses made another > 17 run after this. I followed one of them over to the apartments > 18 on Kirby and found one at the Fruitvale apartment as well. > 19 The first one tried to shake me off, hard to do in a bus, and > 20 stopped for a while at a gas station to call. They sure are > 21 paranoid." > 22 Q. Thank you. [Here is the full posting:] ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From: Keith Henson Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: Gold base not dull Date: 4 Jul 2000 06:13:09 GMT Organization: MindSpring Enterprises Lines: 74 Distribution: world Message-ID: <8jrv9l$2r1$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net> References: <8jh9fo$lnf$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net> <8jk0uc$gqa$1@slb7.atl.mindspring.net> <8jm6uj$63d$1@slb7.atl.mindspring.net> <8jmj7t$pg2$1@slb1.atl.mindspring.net> <395EFE48.8A0849E3@nospam.spam> <8jo2mc$91p$1@slb1.atl.mindspring.net> <8jp19q$v88$1@slb2.atl.mindspring.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: c7.b7.09.67 User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-19990517 ("Psychonaut") (UNIX) (SunOS/4.1.4 (sun4m)) The photos from Sunday, July 2 are at ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/hk/hkhenson/temp I want to move them to umbra xenu, but have been way to busy recently. File "water" shows a sprinkler which is mostly spraying through the fence. It was left on for at least 24 hours. No clears at gold base, or they would have remembered it. thug1 is Eliot Richardson coming after me, trying to get in my face. I didn't recognize him at first, though I knew I had seen him before. Guess I am not a clear either. thug2 is a shot after I started walking toward the main gate. I was interested in getting into the camera view, and the more witnesses the better, even if they are scientologists. You can see how Heavy Thug (HT) reacted to a camera in this and several other shots. thug3 is further toward the gate. thug4, got him! Who is this guy? Anyone know him? thug5 is down by the main gate, me trying to get away from these guys and them trying to crowd me. thug5-10 are various shots from places in the road or from one side or the other as I crossed back and forth--stopping cars. thug 11 is HT DAing me to a driver who stoped. This morning I got out there before 7am. I was not early enough to follow the buses back to the two clam apartments, but all four went by my picket signs within a ten minute period close to 7 am. The buses make another run after this. I followed one of them over to the apartments on Kirby and found one at the Fruitvale Apartment as well. The first one tried to shake me off, hard to do in a bus, and stopped for a while at a gas station to call. They sure are paranoid. The Fruitvale apartments have a security guy playing hide and seek in the bushes with a radio. I offered him an OT3/Xenu flyer. It was somewhat like offering garlic to a vampire, but I could tell there was a certain degree of fascination--because otherwise he would never find out what OT3 was all about. Ah well, there are several Xenu flyers inside gold base, perhaps he will see one. I went back out about noon, parked on the west end by Ashlee's memorial, and started back. Soon as I started toward the main gate Eliot Richardson came walking toward me. I went back to my car, and went by him and started picketing on the east end by (*)'s palace. As expected, it was a short picket because here came ER on the South side and HT with a camera on the North side of the road. (I got photos of both but didn't get them developed today.) That area over the east underpass is not so hot (limited visibility to the west over the hill) for playing in the road, so I decide I would pack it in for the day, work on other aspects of entheta such as scanning in photos and get reinforcements for the 4th and 5th. As I was leaving, a Highway Patrol car came along. I considered chasing him down for a clam encounter, but decided not to bother the Highway Patrol two days in a row (it's a busy holiday). The fun with Eliot and HT inspired some kind soul to buy me a cell phone. Thank you very much. And thanks to the people in California, Oregon, Ohio, New Mexico, and other places who have sent donations. Fred is working on me to sign up with PayPal for accepting small donations. I am not certain this will be safe for donors or if the records could be exposed by court orders--though with as much of scn's resources being tied up by me and others, going after someone who sends me a few bucks seems unlikely. If anyone knows how secure PayPal is against court attacks, let me know. Keith Henson ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 23 Madam clerk, can I have what's been previously > 24 marked as People's Exhibit Number 6? Thank you. > 25 THE CLERK: Counsel, I'm sorry to interrupt. Can I > 26 just ask, 6 and 13 were to be admitted as redacted versions? > 27 THE COURT: No, they're marked. > 28 MR. SCHWARZ: This is one of the redacted versions. > 1 And I am going to have Counsel only read that portion which > 2 has not been redacted by the Court. > 3 THE COURT: You mean the witness? > 4 MR. SCHWARZ: The witness, your Honor, I apologize. > 5 THE CLERK: Okay. Sorry to interrupt. > 6 MR. SCHWARZ: May I approach, your Honor? > 7 THE COURT: Yes. > 8 MR. SCHWARZ: Let the record reflect that I am > 9 handing Mr. Hoden a copy -- what's been previously been marked' > 10 for identification as People's Number 6, which is -- has been > 11 previously authenticated by the Court as a true and correct > 12 copy of what was posted to the net by Mr. Henson. > 13 Q. Now, Mr. Hoden? > 14 A. Yes, sir. > 15 Q. The Court has already redacted a portion of this. > 16 So I would ask that you only read this line. > 17 A. Okay. > 18 Q. Okay? Do you recognize that document? > 19 A. Yes. This is a document that's signed by Keith > 20 Henson and is dated on the 7th of July, 2000. > 21 Q. And what is it? > 22 A. Well, it's a document - > 23 Q. Okay. Thank you. When did you first see that > 24 document? > 25 A. I would have seen this on the 8th of July. > 26 Q. And how did you come to see it? > 27 A. Sent to me from the church in Los Angeles. > 28 Q. Now, would you please read the one line that I > 1 pointed to you? > 2 A. Okay. "And a good topo map. The approach is clear > 3 from the south." > 4 Q. Did that give you cause for concern? > 5 A. Yes, it did. > 6 Q. Why? > 7 A. I was afraid that they were talking about sending > 8 missiles to attack the church, and he was referring to a route > 9 where a missile could come and hit either our chapel or one of > 10 the other buildings from the south, because there's no > 11 mountains to the south, where a topography map would measure > 12 where the mountains are or are not. > 13 Q. So "topo map" means to you topography map? > 14 A. That's correct. > 15 Q. Thank you. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ [I could not find the alleged posting referenced above.] ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 16 Mr. Clerk, may I have Exhibit Number 2? > 17 May I approach, your Honor? > 18 THE COURT: Yes. > 19 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): Mr. Hoden, I'm now handing you > 20 what's previously been marked as People's Exhibit Number 2, > 21 which has been previously authenticated by the Court as a true > 22 and correct copy of what Mr. Henson posted to the net; do you > 23 recognize it? > 24 A. Yes, I do. > 25 Q. What is it? > 26 A. It is a document that was signed by Keith Henson > 27 dated on the 9th of July, 2000. > 28 Q. And when did you first see it? > 1 A. I saw this on the 10th of July, 2000. > 2 Q. How did you come to see it? > 3 A. It was sent to me from the church in Los Angeles. > 4 Q. Now, would you please read the document to the Court > 5 and for the jury? > 6 A. Do I read the part that's yellowed, or what parts do > 7 you want me to read? > 8 Q. Well, just go ahead and read it in context. Read > 9 the entire document since the entire document has been - > 10 MR. HARR: Your Honor, that's been represented as > 11 having been posted by Mr. Henson, and there are those things > 12 on the left edge that we have discussed previously. > 13 MR. SCHWARZ: Yes. > 14 Q. For the record, please, when you're reading - > 15 A. Indicate which is which? > 16 Q. Which is which. Which is not by Mr. Henson, and > 17 then the portion -- when you get to the portion that was > 18 written by Mr. Henson, would you please state that for the > 19 record? > 20 A. Okay, good. All right. So the first portion reads > 21 as follows: "I've already got the permit and a Harpy eagle, > 22 bag limit two Scieos --" Scieos, I'm not sure how they > 23 pronounce it, "two Scieos," I think it's an abbreviation for > 24 Scientology - > 25 MR. HARR: Objection, your Honor. > 26 MR. SCHWARZ: Just read it, please. > 27 THE WITNESS: "I've already got the permit and a > 28 Harpy eagle, bag limit two Scieos per day. If D.M. goes > 1 jogging in his pink bunny suit, I'll give him a two-minute > 2 head start before I slip the eagle. Wouldn't do him any good, > 3 an 18-pound eagle traveling at 40 miles per hour will strike > 4 -- traveling at 40 miles per hour will strike with great > 5 force, and their talons are bigger than a Kodiak bear." > 6 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): Now, please read the portion that > 7 Mr. Henson wrote. > 8 A. "Oh, great. Now --" a symbol "-- has to watch for > 9 eagles as well as cruise missiles." ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ [I could not find the alleged posting referenced above.] ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 10 Q. Okay. Can you please describe the symbol? > 11 A. It's got two -- two parenthesis with a star or an > 12 asterisk in the middle. > 13 Q. Okay. Have you ever seen this symbol before? > 14 A. Yes, I have. > 15 Q. And do you know what it represents? > 16 A. Yes, I do. > 17 Q. What does it represent? > 18 MR. HARR: Objection, your Honor, no foundation. > 19 THE COURT: Sustained. > 20 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): Have you ever seen -- okay. > 21 You've testified that you've seen the mark before? > 22 A. That's correct. > 23 Q. Have you seen it in other documents? > 24 A. Yes, I have. > 25 Q. And over the course of however you've done it, what > 26 do you -- what does that symbol mean to you? > 27 A. Refers to the leader of the church. > 28 MR. HARR: Objection, your Honor, no foundation. > 1 THE COURT: Sustained. > 2 MR. SCHWARZ: I'll rephrase. > 3 Q. You've indicated that you've seen the -- you've seen > 4 the markings before; where else have you seen that marking? > 5 A. On other postings on the internet by Keith Henson. > 6 Q. Okay. Have they ever been defined? > 7 MR. HARR: Objection, your Honor, that's > 8 conclusionary. There's been no authentication. > 9 THE COURT: Sustained. > 10 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): Aside from Mr. Henson what have > 11 you seen about that -- that symbol? > 12 A. I've seen that symbol used by other people to refer > 13 to the spiritual leader of the church. In other words, it's a > 14 symbol that they -- the people who attack the religion or hate > 15 the religion use to refer to the - > 16 MR. HARR: Objection, your Honor, conclusionary on > 17 the last part. > 18 THE COURT: Sustained as to the last part. > 19 MR. SCHWARZ: Okay. > 20 Q. So you're saying that they have used that with > 21 respect to -- they've used the symbol - > 22 THE COURT: Sorry, Counsel, the symbol has been > 23 used? > 24 MR. SCHWARZ: Correct. > 25 Q. The symbol has been used to refer to the > 26 ecclesiastical leader of the church? > 27 A. That is correct. > 28 Q. And his name is? > 1 A. Mr. David Miscavige. > 2 Q. So when you read that document, when you read what > 3 Mr. Henson writes, how do you take it? > 4 A. Well, he's trying to kill the head of the church and > 5 knock off the head of the church. In other words, it's -- I > 6 don't know. It would be like - > 7 MR. HARR: Asked and answered, your Honor. > 8 THE COURT: Sustained. > 9 MR. SCHWARZ: Thank you. You've answered the > 10 question. I appreciate that. > 11 One moment, your Honor. > 12 Can I have Number 17, please? > 13 May I approach, your Honor? > 14 THE COURT: Yes. > 15 MR. SCHWARZ: I'm handing what's been previously > 16 been marked as People's Exhibit Number 17 for identification, > 17 which has been previously been authenticated by the Court as a > 18 true and correct copy of what Mr. Henson posted to the net. > 19 THE COURT: The entire? > 20 MR. SCHWARZ: It's the entire document, your Honor. > 21 Q. Now, there are portions of the -- of that document > 22 that are not entirely Mr. Henson's? > 23 A. That's correct. > 24 Q. So please read the document -- first of all, do you > 25 recognize it? > 26 A. Yes, I do. > 27 MR. HARR: Your Honor, I don't -- sorry to interrupt > 28 Counsel, but I believe with the squiggly deals on the > 1 left-hand margin, again I would indicate Mr. Henson did not > 2 post - > 3 MR. SCHWARZ: I'll instruct the witness. > 4 THE COURT: Disregard the squiggly deals. > 5 MR. SCHWARZ: Well, your Honor, I think what Counsel > 6 meant to say was he just wants me to inform the Court that > 7 part of it's not his. > 8 Q. So first of all, do you recognize it? > 9 A. Yes, I do. > 10 Q. What is it? > 11 A. It is a document that's signed by Keith Henson, and > 12 it's dated on the 11th of July, 2000. > 13 Q. When did you first see it? > 14 A. I saw this on the 12th of July. > 15 Q. And how did you come to see it? > 16 A. Sent to me from the church in Los Angeles. > 17 Q. Okay. Now, would you please read the document and > 18 indicate what is not Mr. Henson's by the -- by the greater > 19 than signs, and then when you get to the portion of the > 20 document that was written by Mr. Henson, would you indicate it > 21 for the jury. > 22 A. Okay. > 23 Q. Is that fair? > 24 A. Sure. > 25 Q. Okay. Please do it. > 26 A. "The range of a pluton M.R.B.M. equal (deleted for > 27 purpose of national security.) C.E.P. on the platform equal > 28 (deleted for purpose of national security,) although I imagine > 1 probably around 750 yards." And then Mr. Henson says, "No > 2 way. Modern weapons are accurate to a matter of a few tens of > 3 yards. The terminal guidance ones are good to single digits," > 4 signed, "Keith Henson." ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ [I could not find the alleged posting referenced above.] ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 5 Q. Thank you. Have you ever heard the acronym > 6 M.R.M.B.? > 7 A. Refers to some sort of missile. I don't know what > 8 the letters stand for - > 9 MR. HARR: Objection, your Honor, nonresponsive. > 10 THE COURT: Sustained. > 11 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): Have you ever heard of it? > 12 A. Yes. > 13 Q. Okay. And to your understanding what does it refer > 14 to? > 15 A. It's a missile. > 16 Q. Okay. Thank you. [...] -- LYING IS A SCIENTOLOGY SACRAMENT ASK THEM ABOUT XENU Mike O'Connor