From mike@leptonicsystems.com Tue Sep 11 00:37:15 2001 Path: sn-us!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!usenetserver.com!news01.optonline.net!news02.optonline.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mike O'Connor Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: Henson Hemet Trial Transcript (to pg 50] References: <3b9c6aff.48375708@news2.lightlink.com> <3b9cc330.70956044@news2.lightlink.com> <3b9cdafc.77048993@news2.lightlink.com> <3b9f32f9.99576604@news2.lightlink.com> <3b9e4f84.106885339@news2.lightlink.com> <3b9d717a.115580778@news2.lightlink.com> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.1 (PPC) X-Face: %I5[u;NN-d'{}I|+j$Riju_Eu}N!t).F:-~.me!)K-xe%_CG6[L\)wALnAYG~rN9'j8eK2s}[%*qA5J>L*vPc^b6pO[2j#)?78<2(m\Yx_\_ug:@i,.;U_'ags%TfqMIWH~/YLmJJ^p Message-ID: Lines: 644 Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 04:37:15 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.186.194.203 X-Trace: news02.optonline.net 1000183035 24.186.194.203 (Tue, 11 Sep 2001 00:37:15 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 00:37:15 EDT Organization: Optimum Online Xref: sn-us alt.religion.scientology:975288 Here are some more of the full postings referenced in the transcript. In article <3b9d717a.115580778@news2.lightlink.com>, hkhenson@home.com (Keith Henson) wrote: > On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 23:43:28 GMT, hkhenson@home.com (Keith Henson) > wrote: > > >(to page 243) [...] > 21 MR. SCHWARZ: May the record reflect that I'm > 22 handing what's been previously been marked for identification > 23 as 18A, People's 18A, which has been -- which is a portion of > 24 a document that has been previously authenticated by the Court > 25 as a true and correct copy of what Mr. Henson posted to the > 26 net. > 27 Q. Do you recognize it? > 28 A. Yes, I do. > 1 Q. And how do you recognize it? > 2 A. Well, because I've seen it before. I've read this > 3 before. > 4 Q. And when was that? > 5 A. This was written on the 12th of July. > 6 THE COURT: Excuse me, do you know when you read it, > 7 sir? > 8 THE WITNESS: Oh, I'm sorry. The 13th of July. > 9 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): Okay. What's the date on that > 10 document? > 11 A. The date on here, on the 12th of July, 2000. > 12 Q. And how did you come to see that document? > 13 A. This was sent to me by our church in Los Angeles. > 14 Q. Okay. And would you please read to the jury that > 15 portion of the document that gave you concern? > 16 A. Okay. "I saw one of the buses turn in at the > 17 eastern most gate. They are totally disrupting traffic in a > 18 hopeless attempt to avoid staff seeing me. Signed Keith > 19 Henson, reporting from the Hemet front." > 20 Q. Thank you. Thank you very much. [I believe this is the full posting:] ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From: Keith Henson Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Picket, fun with thugs (gold base) Supersedes: <8kiamc$o8e$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net> Date: 12 Jul 2000 19:15:25 GMT Organization: MindSpring Enterprises Lines: 51 Message-ID: <8kig4d$vgt$1@slb0.atl.mindspring.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: c7.b7.09.67 User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-19990517 ("Psychonaut") (UNIX) (SunOS/4.1.4 (sun4m)) (A version got posted without being spell checked and justifed.) Yesterday the Riverside 911 Sheriff office (which the CHP vectored me to) was unable to dispatch because I didn't have the address. So this morning (7 am) I did, and when Edwin Richardson and thug 2 were sent out, I called and sure enough a while later no fewer than three Sheriff deputies showed up, all at once. I was on the west going leg almost in front of the main gate at the time. I got the Deputies names, Rahn, Pauling and Kurycowicz (not certain on the last spelling). Apologies for missing ranks. If the Hemet office wants to print out copies of this post and put in in their personnel files, this is one citizen who *really* appreciates their responding to a citizen exercising his right to protest. (And I told them so on the spot.) Turned out that one of them reads a.r.s, or (it wasn't entirely clear) perhaps another deputy reads it. Anyway they were familiar with the whole story dating back to Helena Kobrin's rmgroup. Ken Hoden came out. The guy looks worse than the last time I saw him. A huge bunch of the staff walked by south of the main gate in sight of three sheriff cars with flashing lights and one guy with a sign which asked on one side "What happened to Stacey Moxon Myer" and on the other, "Knowing How to Know is Knowing When to Blow!" Later in the picket, while being followed by two very silent thugs at a good distance, I saw one of the buses turn in at the eastern most gate. They are totally disrupting traffic in a hopeless attempt to avoid staff seeing me. When I decided they had had enough picketing for the morning, I tossed my sign in my car (which was on the west end next to where Ashlee Shaner died) left my thug escort walking back, and drove through the complex to the east end, in sight of (*)'s house. Parked, jumped out and did a few minutes of picketing without my escort. I am sure (*) started screaming at people because I had just tossed my sign in the car when Richardson and thug 2 came tearing up in a black truck. They tried to get my attention, but I was not interested in talking to them. I think I figured out why the thugs were assigned to me. I mentioned in a posting of some Xenu/OT3 flyers being handed through the fence. I think the thugs are out there to be sure no more of them go through the fence. I really wonder what happened to the ones inside. Were they turned in? Did the people hide them? Were any copies made? Ah, in the answers to such questions lies the measure of the effectiveness of a wasp. Keith Henson, Reporting from the Hemet front PS When I got back, I found that Ida has another email from her son. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 21 Could I have Exhibit Number 14. > 22 May I approach, your Honor? > 23 THE COURT: Yes. > 24 MR. SCHWARZ: Let the record reflect that the People > 25 have given the witness a copy -- or what's been previously > 26 marked as People's Exhibit Number 14 for identification, which > 27 is a true and accurate copy of a posting that was -- that the > 28 Court has already authenticated as Mr. Henson's posting. > 1 Q. Do you recognize that? > 2 A. Yes, I do. > 3 Q. What is it? > 4 A. This is a document that's signed by Keith Henson > 5 "reporting from the Hemet front," and it's dated the 13th of > 6 July, 2000. > 7 Q. Okay. Would you please -- first of all, how did you > 8 come to see that? > 9 A. This was sent to me from our church in Los Angeles > 10 on the following day. > 11 Q. And can you please read that portion of the document > 12 that gave rise to your concern? > 13 A. There is a whole page here, so I have to just go > 14 through it for a second. > 15 Q. That's fine. Take your time. > 16 A. Okay. > 17 Q. Okay. would you please read that portion of the > 18 document that gave you concern. > 19 A. Well, the first part talks -- should I just read > 20 this? The first part here caused me concern at the time. > 21 Q. Okay. > 22 A. He says, "Serious entheta kept me busy through the > 23 heat of the day, but I got back out there a little after 4:30. > 24 I was interested to see buses take staff back to their > 25 apartments, but this was not to be. It seems --" that little > 26 mark, that little symbol "-- had given orders that the buses > 27 not be moved while an S.P. was nearby." > 28 Q. Okay. > 1 A. Then down here it says, "After one pass to the east > 2 end of the complex, I stayed near the west end where the buses > 3 are parked. 5:00 p.m. and no movement. 5:30, still there. > 4 6:00, 6:30, thug two gave up at 6:45, and Richardson followed > 5 five minutes later. 7:00 p.m. the buses had not moved. > 6 Finally, pity for those who had been there since 7:00 a.m. got > 7 to me, though they might have moved them back to the > 8 apartments in the small vans." > 9 MR. HARR: Your Honor, I believe there might have > 10 been a word left out of that. I don't mean to - > 11 THE COURT: You will have a chance to cross-examine > 12 the witness. [Here is the full posting:] ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From: Keith Henson Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: Picket, fun with thugs (gold base) Date: 13 Jul 2000 04:21:36 GMT Organization: MindSpring Enterprises Lines: 41 Message-ID: <8kjg4g$8nj$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net> References: <8kig4d$vgt$1@slb0.atl.mindspring.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: c7.b7.09.67 User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-19990517 ("Psychonaut") (UNIX) (SunOS/4.1.4 (sun4m)) Afternoon report. *Serious* entheta kept me busy through the heat of the day, but I got back out there a little after 4:30. I was interested in seeing the buses take staff back to their apartments, but this was not to be. It seems (*) had given orders that the buses not be moved while an SP was nearby . . . Richardson and thug 2 didn't pick up on me till I had walked most the way from the west end to the main gate. They were both in bullbait mode, but I don't think their hearts were really in it. The CHP/Deputies wanted me to get a secret tape of them bullbaiting, so I did. I will get the tape over to the deputies in the morning, but it was more pathetic than anything else. One of the best was an accusation of having sex with a woman who was not my wife in front of kids--in the front yard. Of course, everybody knows you do that in the *back* yard. :-) After one pass to the east end of the complex, I stayed near the west end where the buses are parked. 5 pm and no movement, 5:30, still there, 6, 6:30, thug 2 gave up at 6:45 and Richardson followed 5 minutes later. 7 pm and the buses had not moved. Finally pity for those who had been there since 7 am got to me. (Though they might have moved them back to the apartments in the small vans.) I think by preventing buses from operating this afternoon I equaled (but did not exceed) Bruce Pettycrew's SP powerz of hardening concrete in a wheelbarrow. I have a hard time *imagining* what it must be like inside the cult's compound. The dwarf must be spitting fire in all directions at the complete mess *one* wog is causing. Of course, I have to give credit where credit is due to (*) for acting like a madman. Sweet paranoid dreams Davie. Keith Henson, Reporting from the Hemet front. PS, Is another letter coming to Ida? ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 13 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): Is that it? > 14 A. Yes, sir. > 15 Q. Now, why did that give you concern? > 16 A. Well, when he was monitoring us every day and then > 17 reporting up exactly what he was doing, and then all -- when I > 18 would read the thing I go, okay, good, he's going to sit > 19 outside the apartments where people live from 4:30 to 5:30 to > 20 6:30. In other words, it was almost like, how do you plan the > 21 next day, because where is he going to be next? And my major > 22 concern was the safety of my staff here at the church. And > 23 the information I had based upon the thing I read is that he > 24 was capable of setting off bombs - > 25 THE COURT: Excuse me, sir, you've answered the > 26 question. > 27 MR. SCHWARZ: Thank you.I appreciate that. > 28 May I approach, your Honor? > 1 THE COURT: Yes. > 2 MR. SCHWARZ: Let the record reflect that I am > 3 handing the witness People's 10 for identification which has > 4 been previously authenticated by the Court as a true and > 5 correct copy of what Mr. Henson posted to the internet. > 6 Q. Do you recognize that document, sir? . > 7 A. Yes, I do. > 8 Q. How do you recognize it? > 9 A. Because I saw this document before. > 10 Q. And when did you see this? > 11 A. I saw this on the 10th of January -- no, I'm sorry, > 12 I didn't. I saw this in the spring of 2000. > 13 Q. Okay. > 14 A. Like about February. > 15 Q. All right. And what's the date of the document? > 16 A. The date of the document is 9 January 2000, and it's > 17 signed "Keith Henson." > 18 Q. Okay. And would you please read the entire, the > 19 entire document, but indicate to the Court the difference > 20 about what actually Mr. Henson wrote? > 21 A. Okay. Starts out, "A group of rag tag S.P.'s, all > 22 of different minds and opinions, but all of one goal." And > 23 then another person says, "What is the one goal?" "To stop > 24 the Church of Scientology illegal and inhumane practices, or > 25 to destroy it utterly without sorrow, belief system and all." > 26 And then Keith Henson writes, "Either would work for me, but > 27 the latter seems like an easier task." And then it's signed > 28 "Keith Henson." [I could not find the post referenced above. I did find a post that seems to quote the words used above:] ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From: Beverly Rice Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: test Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2000 20:19:07 -0500 Organization: Lightlink Internet Lines: 22 Message-ID: <3877E20A.69FA@ao.net> References: <387777FF.62B2@ao.net> <20000108195826.21409.00000978@ng-cl1.aol.com> Reply-To: dbj1120@ao.net NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.34.12 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; U) X-NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.79.143.76 Lr2447 wrote: > folderman sed > > Trying to figure out how this newsgroup works > Beverly say > >>A group of "rag-tag" SP's, all of different minds and opinions but all of one > goal. > What is the ONE goal? To stop the CoS illegal and inhumane practices? Or to > destroy it utterly and without sorrow, belief system and all? No, dear, simply to speak our minds, don't be so paranoid. Try reading the NG and what various other posters have stated as far as their thoughts and concerns before making a generalization. If you don't care enough to read what others here have to say, then don't bother trying to have someone explain for you what you don't care enough to sort out for yourself. Beverly ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 Q. And why did that concern you? > 2 A. Well, because exactly what it says, it says to > 3 destroy, referring - > 4 THE COURT: You've answered the question, sir. > 5 MR. SCHWARZ: Thank you. May I approach, your > 6 Honor? > 7 THE COURT: Yes. > 8 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): I'm handing you what's previously > 9 been marked for identification as People's Exhibit Number 7; > 10 do you recognize that? > 11 A. Yes, I do. > 12 Q. That document, too, has been previously > 13 authenticated by the Court as a true and correct copy of what > 14 Mr. Henson previously posted to the internet. Can you tell us > 15 what it is? What is it? > 16 A. Well, this is a document that's dated the 9th of > 17 July from Keith Henson. > 18 Q. And when did you first receive it? Or when did you > 19 first see it? > 20 A. I would have seen this on the 10th of July. > 21 Q. And who did you -- and how did you come to see it? > 22 A. Well, it was sent to me by our church in Los > 23 Angeles. > 24 Q. Okay. I'm taking this as a pattern, this is a > 25 pattern? > 26 A. Okay. > 27 Q. Is it? > 28 A. Oh, yes. In other words, he would be out there one > 1 day, and then - > 2 THE COURT: Excuse me, sir. > 3 THE WITNESS: Yes, sir, it is a pattern. > 4 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): It's a pattern. Would you please > 5 take your time, read over that document, and find that portion > 6 of the document that gave you concern. And then when you get > 7 to that can you please inform us where you're reading from for > 8 Counsel's sake. Okay? > 9 A. Yes, sir. > 10 Q. Take your time, please. > 11 A. Okay. I found the spot. > 12 Q. Can you please tell us where you're reading from? > 13 A. Second paragraph starting with "Okay." > 14 Q. Okay. Would you please read that? > 15 A. Yes, I will. "Okay. I am more --" I'm sorry. > 16 "Okay, I am more than willing to demonstrate the effect I have > 17 on Gold Base. Standing on the west overpass, and just > 18 watching out, the foot traffic over the road stops when I am > 19 in any place close on the road. Or watch a van back up wildly > 20 from the west gate if I show up." > 21 Q. Is there anything else in that document that gave > 22 you concern? > 23 A. Yes. Seven more paragraphs down where it starts > 24 with, "You have to go." > 25 Q. Okay. > 26 A. "You have to go from one side of the complex to the > 27 other, either have to ride a van or get --" I'm sorry. > 28 "Either have to ride a van or get clearance to go under the > 1 road from some dude who knows where I'm at. Where I am." > 2 Sorry. "It is nuts. You should see what happens when I go > 3 watch them load the buses. The bus just sits there." > 4 Q. And why does that concern you? > 5 A. One, obviously he's monitoring the schedule of all > 6 the buses, where they go. And number two, he enjoys going > 7 wherever our people are to prevent us from going in and out of > 8 the property or being able to make full use of our property. > 9 MR. HARR: Objection, your Honor, conclusionary. > 10 THE COURT: Sustained. > 11 MR. SCHWARZ: Thank you. [Here is the full posting:] ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From: Keith Henson Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: Fifty Thousand "Clears"? Date: 9 Jul 2000 02:17:58 GMT Organization: MindSpring Enterprises Lines: 46 Message-ID: <8k8ncm$73k$1@slb2.atl.mindspring.net> References: <280f7466.4aaf6332@usw-ex0104-025.remarq.com> <20000708163025.02063.00001368@ng-cv1.aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: c7.b7.09.67 User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-19990517 ("Psychonaut") (UNIX) (SunOS/4.1.4 (sun4m)) From: Keith Henson Subject: Re: Fifty Thousand "Clears"? Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology References: <280f7466.4aaf6332@usw-ex0104-025.remarq.com> <20000708163025.02063.00001368@ng-cv1.aol.com> Organization: Mistmagoo55 wrote: snip > Now wait....Henson said "All it takes is one SP to enturbulate the place". > We said he is delusional in his estimation of the effect he is creating. He is. Ok. I am more than willing to demonstrate the effect I have on gold base. You stand on the west overpass and just watch how the foot traffic under the road stops when I am any place close on the road. Or watch a van back up wildly from the west gate if I show up. > So what if two people or five people come out to talk to him? Heck, for almost two weeks nobody would say boo. Then they brought out two thugs. > Does that mean > he has enturbulated the whole place? NO! It means 2 > people are out talking with him, if that is true. You have to go from one side of the complex to the other. You either have to ride a van or get clearence to go under the road from some dude who knows where I am. It is *nuts*. You should see what happens when I go to watch them load the buses. The bus just sits there. And the Tree Tech! Thousands and thousands of bucks for trees and the gardners working all night under guards who will shoo them back inside if an SP shows up. > So we answered your question, so now you owe us a dollar, and we think Dobe > owes us one too....or is it you owe us two? > Well at least one. So check or credit card? :) > Magoo! ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 12 May I approach, your Honor? > 13 THE COURT: Yes. > 14 MR. SCHWARZ: Can the record reflect that I am > 15 handing the witness what's been previously marked for > 16 identification as People's Exhibit 19A, which is a -- which > 17 has been previously authenticated. That portion of the > 18 document has been previously authenticated as a true and > 19 correct copy of what Mr. Henson posted to the net. > 20 Q. Would you please read to the jury -- or first of > 21 all, do you recognize that document? > 22 A. Yes, I do. > 23 Q. And what is it? > 24 A. This is a document dated the 20th of July, 2000 > 25 signed by Keith Henson. > 26 Q. And when did you first come to see it? > 27 A. I would have seen this on the 21st of July. > 28 Q. Okay. And where did you get it? > 1 A. This was sent to me by our church in Los Angeles. > 2 Q. And would you please read that document to the > 3 Court? > 4 A. Yes, sir. "I can tell when I am away --" I'm sorry. > 5 "I can tell when I am way to the east of the plaza," > 6 parenthesis, "near the main gate, that there are lots of > 7 people crossing the plaza and going into the underpass. But > 8 when I get there very few people can be seen on either side of > 9 the road. I suspect they are huddling in the underpass until > 10 they get the all clear signal that I have moved on." > 11 Q. And again, why did that concern you, sir? > 12 A. Well, it concerned me because the fact that > 13 sometimes people would get trapped, so to speak, in the > 14 underpass, because when he was over, above it people had, you > 15 know, were afraid to come out because they didn't know which > 16 side he was standing on - > 17 MR. HARR: Objection, your Honor, conclusion. > 18 THE COURT: Excuse me. Sustained. > 19 MR. SCHWARZ: Okay. [Here is the full posting:] ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From: Keith Henson Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology Subject: Re: Back in Hemet Date: 20 Jul 2000 21:35:47 GMT Organization: MindSpring Enterprises Lines: 54 Message-ID: <8l7rbj$brm$1@slb1.atl.mindspring.net> References: <8l50nj$lac$1@slb7.atl.mindspring.net> <8l5ahr$s19$1@slb7.atl.mindspring.net> <8l6j2r$ovo$1@slb7.atl.mindspring.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: c7.b7.09.67 User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-19990517 ("Psychonaut") (UNIX) (SunOS/4.1.4 (sun4m)) After a short night I was out again at 7 am. I got thugs again and taped them. They kept up an intermittent chatter while I said only one sentence. It was all I could do to keep from laughing out loud at some of the odd distortions of things out of my past. I will only give one example, Dora Kent. Dora was a case where a clueless Riverside coroner got carried away and charged my cryonics organization. The funny part is that associating *me* with this event is totally silly because the Dora Kent events happened before I got active in cryonics (as anyone who reads Great Mambo Chicken and the Transhuman Condition would see). Thug 2 was more active today, getting in front of me and slowing so much that I had to step out in the road to get by him. I have some photos of him too close. They also tried to block me taking photos of the largely empty plaza. I can tell when I am way to the east of the plaza (near the main gate) that there are lots of people crossing the plaza and going into the underpass. But when I get there, very few people can be seen on either side of the road. I suspect they are huddling in the underpass till they get the all clear signal that I have moved on. OTs, heh. I put in an hour, left heading into town, stopped on the far end and got out a sign. I gave Richardson and thug 2 just enough time to run up to the main gate and get a ride and then left. Shopping and other entheta kept me busy the rest of the morning. I will say that a remarkable number of local ministers have been discussing the cult of Xenu lately. This might have something to do with a certain person who mails a lot. Of course, when the ministers start talking, some of the most amazing stories come out. One of them, Bob Beckett from Dwelling Place tells of phone taps (RF kind) which were found on both the church phone and his residence. Another tells that it took less than half an hour from the time I visited his office to an agent of scientology showing up and trying to get an interview with him. Whatever scientology has been trying to do, it seems to have had the effect of giving me an astonishing level of credibility among the local minsiters. Keep it up fellows. They are still loading Ida's neighborhood with PIs. I mostly ignore them unless they get to obvious and then I chase them to get license numbers. Incidentally, the license from yesterday was indeed a PI outfit. I am going to call them before putting the name on the net. There is one other item which I should mention. The rental car company I have been using put me on the refuse to rent to list. Why? They had no problem with payment and I never even scratched a car. But every time I rented, they got several phone calls asking about me, last time a woman came in asking about me, sometimes people call up claiming to be me who are not, and (according to national customer service) the Ontario police called. The last was easy to check out, records at the police dept in Ontario has no records with my name, so the chances are that they were scammed by the scientologists. Company name in a later post after more investigation. Keith Henson ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 20 Q. Did you -- I'll rephrase. Did you ever have an > 21 occasion to see an event similar to this, what's described in > 22 this document? > 23 MR. HARR: Objection, your Honor, relevance. > 24 THE COURT: I don't know what that means, Counsel. > 25 Could you rephrase the question? > 26 MR. SCHWARZ: I'll rephrase the question. I'll > 27 rephrase the question. > 28 Q. You indicated that it concerned you; why -- let's > 1 just start over. Why did it concern you? > 2 A. It concerned me because, one, he was monitoring the > 3 traffic inside our church. That concerned me. That's not - > 4 I don't consider that normal. In other words, people don't > 5 usually have to go to church - > 6 THE COURT: Excuse me, sir. If you'll just tell us > 7 what concerned you. Not - > 8 THE WITNESS: Why. > 9 THE COURT: And not why. > 10 THE WITNESS: Okay. It concerned me because > 11 somebody was monitoring everything we did in the church, and > 12 they would, wherever our church staff would go he would follow > 13 them and be there in a threatening fashion. That's what > 14 concerned me the most. And down to the level of somebody just > 15 walking from one church dining hall to the church chapel, he > 16 was there in between the chapel and the dining hall trying to > 17 prevent that activity. > 18 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): Thank you. While I'm standing > 19 here, let the record reflect that I am handing to the witness > 20 what's been previously been marked as People's Exhibit 25A for > 21 identification, which is a true and correct copy, or a portion > 22 of a document that was previously authenticated by the Court > 23 as Mr. Henson's posting. > 24 Do you recognize it? > 25 A. Yes, I do. > 26 Q. And what is it? > 27 A. This is a document that's written on the 3rd of > 28 August, 2000, signed by Keith Henson. > 1 Q. And would you please -- or when did you first see > 2 it, sir? > 3 A. I would have seen this on the 4th of August, 2000. > 4 Q. And where would you receive that from? Who did you > 5 get it from? > 6 A. Sent to me from the church in Los Angeles. > 7 Q. And could you please read the document? > 8 A. Yes. "As one person put it, one wog, one thousand > 9 terrified clams." > 10 THE COURT REPORTER: Excuse me, was that "wog," > 11 w-o-g? > 12 THE WITNESS: Yes, it is. > 13 Q. (By Mr. Schwarz): Have you ever heard the term - > 14 now, we've already talked about clams. Have you ever heard of > 15 the term "wog"? > 16 A. Yes, I have. > 17 Q. So the clams we've talked about, what does that mean > 18 to you? > 19 A. Clams - > 20 THE COURT: We've already heard that, Counsel. > 21 Q. Okay. So what gave you cause for concern with > 22 respect to this document? > 23 A. He's pointing out that he's out there and he's got > 24 one thousand people terrified. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ [I was unable to locate the alleged posting referenced above.] ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 25 MR. SCHWARZ: Thank you. At this time, your Honor, > 26 we've finally gotten through all of the postings. Thank > 27 goodness for all of us. [...] -- LYING IS A SCIENTOLOGY SACRAMENT ASK THEM ABOUT XENU Mike O'Connor